Link articolo originale

Archivio di tutti i clip:
clips.quintarelli.it
(Notebook di Evernote).

The FBI is Tracking Our Faces in Secret. We’re Suing. There can be no accountability if there is no transparency.
Kade Crockford
October 31, 2019
Many of us wear masks on Halloween for fun. But what about a world in which we have to wear a mask every single day to protect our privacy from the government’s oppressive eye?

Face
recognition surveillance technology has already made that frightening world a
reality in Hong Kong, and it’s quickly becoming a scary
possibility in the United States.

The FBI is currently collecting data about our faces, irises, walking patterns, and voices, permitting the government to pervasively identify, track, and monitor us. The agency can match or request a match of our faces against at least 640 million images of adults living in the U.S. And it is reportedly piloting Amazon’s flawed face recognition surveillance technology.

Face and
other biometric surveillance technologies can enable undetectable, persistent,
and suspicionless surveillance on an unprecedented scale. When placed in the
hands of the FBI — an unaccountable,
deregulated, secretive intelligence agency with an unresolved history of
anti-Black racism — there is even more
reason for alarm. And when that agency stonewalls our requests for information about how its agents are tracking and
monitoring our faces, we should all be concerned.

That’s why today we’re asking a federal court to intervene and order the FBI and related agencies to turn over all records concerning their use of face recognition technology.

The FBI’s
troubling political policing practices underscore the urgent need for
transparency. Under the leadership of the agency’s patriarch — the disgraced J. Edgar Hoover —
the FBI obsessively spied on left-wing, Indigenous rights, anti-war, and Black
power activists across the country. Hoover infamously tried to blackmail Martin Luther King, Jr.,
encouraging the civil rights leader to kill himself to avoid the shame Hoover’s
leaks to journalists would bring to him and his family. The FBI was also involved in the 1969 killing of Fred
Hampton, a brilliant Chicago leader in the Black Panther Party who was
assassinated by Chicago Police while he lay asleep in his bed next to his
pregnant girlfriend.

While Hoover’s
reign may be history, the FBI’s campaign against domestic dissent is not.

Since at
least 2010, the FBI has monitored civil society groups, including
racial justice movements, Occupy Wall Street, environmentalists, Palestinian
solidarity activists, Abolish ICE protesters, and Cuba and Iran normalization
proponents. In recent years, the FBI has wasted considerable resources to spy on
Black activists, who the agency labeled “Black Identity Extremists” to justify
even more surveillance of the Black Lives Matter movement and other fights for
racial justice. The agency has also investigated climate justice activists
including 350.org and the Standing Rock water protectors under the banner
of protecting national security.

Because of
the FBI’s secrecy, little is known about how the agency is supercharging its
surveillance activities with face recognition technology. But what little is
known from public reporting, the FBI’s own admissions to Congress, and
independent tests of the technology gives ample reason to be concerned.

For instance, the FBI recently claimed to Congress that the agency does not need to demonstrate probable cause of criminal activity before using its face surveillance technology on us. FBI witnesses at a recent hearing also could not confirm whether the agency is meeting its constitutional obligations to inform criminal defendants when the agency has used the tech to identify them. The failure to inform people when face recognition technology is used against them in a criminal case, or the failure to turn over robust information about the technology’s error rates, source code, and algorithmic training data, robs defendants of their due process rights to a fair trial.

This lack
of transparency would be frightening enough if the technology worked. But it
doesn’t: Numerous studies have shown face surveillance technology is prone to significant
racial and gender bias. One peer-reviewed study from MIT found that face
recognition technology can misclassify the faces of dark skinned women up to 35
percent of the time. Another study found that so-called “emotion
recognition” software identified Black men as more angry and contemptuous than
their white peers. Other researchers have found that face surveillance
algorithms discriminate against transgender and gender
nonconforming people. When our freedoms and rights are on the line, one false
match is too many.

Of course,
even in the highly unlikely event that face recognition technology were to
become 100 percent accurate, the technology’s threat to our privacy rights and
civil liberties remains extraordinary. This dystopian surveillance technology
threatens to fundamentally alter our free society into one where we’re treated
as suspects to be tracked and monitored by the government 24/7.

That’s why
a number of cities and states are taking action to prevent the spread of
ubiquitous face surveillance, and why law enforcement agencies, at minimum,
must come clean about when, where, and how they are using face recognition
technology. There can be no accountability if there is no transparency.